CHAPTER IX
I have appendicitis; what shall
I do to be saved? Don't eat anything until well. Use a stomach tube and wash
out the stomach; then use a fountain syringe and wash out the bowels; take a hot
bath as hot as can be borne, and stay in the tub until all the pain is gone, or as
long as possible; then go to bed, put ice on the bowels and keep it on until the
temperature is reduced to 101° F., then apply hot applications or poultices
and continue the poulticing until the bowels move, and the bowels will not move until
the abscess breaks.
Use an enema every night as a routine,
and drink all the water desired, when there is no nausea.
Don't manipulate the forming abscess,
nor allow anyone else to do so.
If you are really in doubt about what
you have, think over what I have written about strangulation or positive obstruction,
and if you think you have it, send for the best physician you know and get his opinion
of whether you have obstruction or not, but don't allow him to burst an abscess with
his manipulations! For, my word for it, if he can't weigh symptoms and tell whether
or not you have complete obstruction without punching holes in you with his bimanual
manipulation, neither would he be able to do so after examining you.
I do not say this because I like to
make it hard for doctors, but I prefer staying the heavy hand of the doctor to keeping
still and allowing him unwittingly to kill his patient.
First of all wash the stomach out with
a siphon tube, then see to it that nothing but water goes into the stomach until
the bowels move.
I put my cases on a complete fast,
give no drugs, apply ice to the region of the appendix, keep the feet warm, and keep
the patient in an atmosphere of hope and belief in his recovery, and a recovery always
follows. I prescribe an enema of warm water once or twice daily, getting all the
water possible into the bowels.
These patients are so comfortable after
the second or third day that it is hard to make them or their friends believe that
they have appendicitis People are so afraid that they will starve to death if they
have no food for a few days that they make haste to get put on a killing treatment
rather than run any risk. This fear is absurd Physicians are largely to blame for
this popular ear, for those who do not feed by mouth still have the idea that their
patients must have nourishment, so they feed by rectum. This is also absurd. What
the patient needs is rest, and the more complete the rest the quicker the recovery.
Give the patient all the water he wants.
The bowels will move in fourteen to
twenty eight days from the beginning of the attack. Then the fast can be broken by
giving a glass of hot milk, which is to be chewed well, or given in the form of junket;
this is to be repeated three times a day for a week, or give the milk twice a day
and a plate of mutton broth for the third meal. I do not give solid food because
there is a large abscess cavity opening into the bowels, and if solid food is given
before it has time to close, it is liable to find its way into this cavity, thereby
preventing healing, and bringing on a chronic condition that will ultimately end
in death. The less food taken for one week after the discharge takes place, the better.
Any rational individual should see that withholding food is the proper treatment.
Milk should be thoroughly mixed with saliva or not taken at all. Remember that if
milk is not taken with great deliberation, and great care given to thoroughly
insalivate each sip, then it amounts to the same thing as eating solid food.
Milk is a solid food when taken into
the stomach as a beverage or a drink like water.
In appendicitis all nature cries out
for rest, and if it is given 99 out of every 100 cases will get well and there will
be no suffering and no danger after the first seventy-two hours.
The ordinary physician sends for a
surgeon, and if he is a victim of the surgical mania the patient must be operated
upon at once, for if twelve or twenty-four hours are given, the conditions may clear
up and an operation will be unnecessary. The majority of surgeons feel that they
will forfeit their right to heaven if they do not cut at once. The consequence is
that there are many patients operated upon who are as innocent of having the disease
as the surgeon is innocent of a knowledge of a better plan of treatment.
Of course, the surgeon declares that
pus should be let out by cutting into it, or it is liable to break into the peritoneal
cavity and cause death This is positively not the truth, for when an abscess threatens,
nature at once proceeds to throw a wall around in order to avoid accidents. All around
the point of prospective abscesses, heavy walls of adhesions are built, and if nature
is not interfered with, the abscess will break into the gut, because it is the point
of least resistance, and it is also the point favored by gravity. The surgeons when
they operate in these cases work exactly opposite to nature.
If these abscesses are allowed to open
into the bowel and solid food is kept away from the patient, full and uncomplicated
recovery will take place. If solid food is given too soon it is liable to find its
way into the abscess cavity and cause a blind fistula, which may take on acute inflammation
at any time. These cases then become chronic and are called recurring appendicitis.
It is sound surgery, in dealing with abscesses, to find, if possible, the direction
nature is taking to evacuate pus and be guided by this suggestion in evacuating a
pus cavity.
In order to cure appendicitis you must
remove the cause. Cutting off the appendix, opening an abscess, withholding food
till the acute symptoms have passed; such treatment is not removing the cause. Nothing
short of changing the eating habits of the patient will cure, so the surgeon who
knows nothing about food and its action--what part improper eating has to do with
bringing on the disease--will never be able to cure.
Operating for this disease will fall
into disrepute in time, for there are already cases recurring and the second and
third operation will be necessary among those who survived the first. There is not
a scintilla of logical reasoning in defense of the operation. Because some get well
after an operation is no proof that the operation was necessary; fortunately for
the operator there is no way to prove that the case operated upon would have recovered
without the operation. If the case be not complicated by bungling treatment an operation
is uncalled for. If a case has been medicated and fed to death--abused to the extent
of causing a rupture into the peritoneal cavity--surgery must be resorted to as the
only hope.
If a case survive an operation the
patient is no wiser than he was before, and knows nothing about avoiding another
attack, for let it be said loud enough to be heard by all, and with no fear of successful
contradiction, that if every child at birth should have the appendix removed there
would not be one case less of appendicitis than there is with the appendix intact.
Of course, technically there could be no appendicitis without an appendix, but the
cecum would become inflamed just as readily.
No amount of forcing drugs given by
the mouth can induce a movement from above the constriction, but a great amount of
pain can be produced by attempting to force a passage. No one comprehending the true
state of affairs would be foolhardy enough to try to force the bowels to move. The
reader can readily imagine the great pain and danger liable to follow cathartic drugs,
for they stimulate severe peristaltic contractions. The contractions drive the contents
of the small intestine against the inflamed cut-off, but there it must stop. If the
parts have become softened, which they do by the inflammation, there is danger of
perforation and an escape of the contents of the bowels into the peritoneal cavity,
after which diffuse peritonitis and death follow. Surgery can hardly hope to save
such patients; in fact they usually die; this is why the surgeon recommends an early
operation.
If all cases are to be so abused and
if there were no better way to treat them I also should say, operate at once as soon
as the disease is discovered; but I know from years of experience that there is a
better way to care for these patients.