S&H Home Ag Library Vegetable Mould (contents) Next Chapter
Introduction
From an edition published by Faber
and Faber, London, 1945
by Sir Albert Howard
WHEN I first learned from the publishers of their intention to
reprint Charles Darwin's The Formation of Vegetable Mould
as one of their contributions to the discussion of the principles
underlying farming and gardening, the timeliness of this step
needed no argument. At a period when present-day agricultural
and horticultural teaching and research are being critically examined
with a view to their speedy reform, only good could result from
the re-publication of the results of some forty years' observation,
experiment, and thought devoted by our greatest naturalist to
the part played by earthworms in the history of the world and,
in particular, to the manner in which they prepare the ground
for the growth of plants and of seedlings of all kinds. When this
intimation was followed by a request to write an introduction
which would link up Darwin's work with the recent results on the
earthworm and with the present controversy about artificially
stimulated crops, I at once agreed.
For some time I had been seeking for the most
effective and convincing foundation on which the reformed agriculture
of the West could be based and which would, at the same time,
direct future agricultural research into biological channels.
Here lay ready to hand an ideal starting point and, moreover,
one which would compel attention to the role of the unseen labour
force of the soil and to factors which the advocates of chemical
farming could not lightly dismiss. No more effective basis for
the organic farming and gardening of to-morrow could be found
than the long and painstaking investigations described in this
volume. It would help to accomplish for the temperate regions
what King's Farmers of Forty Centuries has already done
for the tropics and subtropics.
If this book, which deals with the formation
of vegetable mould through the action of earthworms, is the real
foundation for the study of the principles underlying farming
and gardening, why should the renewed study of such a well-known
work be necessary to-day? Why did the book fail to influence agricultural
teaching and research when it first appeared in 1881? The answer
to these questions will be found in the manner in which investigations
on farming have developed since 1840, when Liebig's Chemistry
in its Applications to Agriculture and Physiology was published.
This essay, coupled with the results of the well-known wheat experiments
on the Broadbalk field at Rothamsted, exercised a profound influence
on the minds of investigators and farmers alike. Till about the
end of the nineteenth century agricultural science was still a
branch of chemistry. The Formation of Vegetable Mould
through the Action of Worms, therefore, appeared when the ideas
founded on the Liebig and Rothamsted traditions were at their
zenith. It occurred to no one that the manner in which earthworms
(1) periodically expose the surface soil to the air, (2) sift
it so that no stones larger than the particles they can swallow
are left in it, and (3) at the same time mingle the mould intimately
together like a gardener who prepares fine soil for his choicest
plants -- were all matters of the most profound significance in
crop production. The attention of all concerned was directed solely
to the chemistry of the soil water, i.e. to a single factor only
of a vast biological complex.
That Darwin's work was without influence on
agricultural education in the 'nineties I know from personal experience,
for it was during the academic year of 1896-7 that I attended
the various courses of lectures necessary to obtain the University
Diploma of Agriculture at Cambridge. No references to earthworms
and their work in preparing the food materials needed by crops
were made in the lectures on agricultural chemistry offered to
me: I never even heard Darwin's name mentioned in connection with
the maintenance of soil fertility, but I was told much of the
virtues of artificial manures for increasing crops and of the
efficacy of poison sprays for controlling plant diseases. It was
not till the next two academic years, 1897-9, when studying for
Parts I and II of the Natural Sciences Tripos that I first came
into intimate contact with Darwin's books, including the one dealing
with his studies of the earthworm. Later, during my Indian service
(1905-31) when I became deeply interested in the preparation of
humus on a large scale, the place of the earthworm and of the
termite in converting crude vegetable matter into food materials
for the crop appeared more and more important as the years passed.
But it was after my retirement from service
in India in 1931, when steps were taken to bring the large-scale
preparation of humus to the notice of the farming community, that
I began to realize the urgent necessity of preserving the earthworms
in the farms and gardens of Great Britain from destruction. Case
after case came under my observation where the continued application
of artificial manures and the use of poison sprays like lime sulphur
and tar oils for keeping the pests of fruit trees in check led
to the destruction of earthworms on a colossal scale.
Eventually during the years 1935-8 I was able
to pay the closest attention to the way artificial manures either
reduce or eliminate altogether the earthworm population. On some
3,000 acres of land near Spalding in south Lincolnshire, the property
of the late Mr. George Caudwell, I spent many weeks in working
out an improved method of green-manuring for the potato crop and
was given every possible facility and help by my host in getting
to the bottom of potato growing on the alluvial soils of Holbeach
Marsh. On Mr. Caudwell's farms about 1,500 acres of potatoes were
raised every year on artificials only, and for a time exceptionally
heavy crops had been obtained. But by 1935 the soil was showing
distinct signs of wearing out and steps had to be taken to increase
the content of organic matter. My opinion was asked as to the
best method of doing this. I recommended a return to mixed farming
which should include laying down a few hundred acres every year
to temporary leys and the return to the old East Anglian custom
of mucking the second clover crop before ploughing under in the
late summer. This, however, would have involved a considerable
reduction in the area under potatoes, to allow for the maintenance
of cattle and pigs and the production of large quantities of farmyard
manure. Unfortunately both the beef and the pig trade at that
time were under a cloud and Mr. Caudwell considered my proposals
would not pay at the prices of meat then ruling.
He pressed me to suggest some alternative for
increasing the organic content of his land, making the best use
of about 1,000 tons of farmyard manure produced by his team of
some hundred horses. This manure was therefore used to activate
a green-manure crop of beans raised on the land under peas, which
were always grown between two potato crops. The peas were cut
in early July, carried to the shelling machines, the pulpy residues
being returned immediately to the surface of the same land which,
in the brief interval, had been ploughed and sown with beans.
On this layer of pea haulm pulp a moderate dressing of farmyard
manure (about five tons to the acre) was immediately spread, so
that the newly sown bean land was covered with a double layer
of organic matter -- pea haulm pulp below and farmyard manure
above: the raw materials needed to manufacture a thin coating
of humus on the surface of the soil under the growing beans were
thus provided. The beans soon grew through this fermenting layer,
which the young foliage kept moist. By October the beans were
in flower and from three to four feet high. They were lightly
turned under, together with the layer of humus which had, in the
meantime, formed on the surface. The green crop was in this way
provided with a very efficient activator as well as ample oxygen
for conversion into humus. Nitrification took place before the
next crop of potatoes was planted the following year. This method
of green-manuring worked well and the tilth markedly improved.
But besides this dressing of organic matter Mr. Caudwell insisted
on applying about 15 cwt. to the acre of a complete artificial
manure containing a large quantity of sulphate of ammonia. To
keep blight at bay the potatoes were frequently dusted with copper
salts.
The effect of all this was a heavy crop of potatoes,
but the exceedingly sparse earthworm population did not increase
as it might have done had no chemicals been used. Here was an
excellent opportunity of observing the effect of humus supplemented
by artificials on the earthworm population. These animals found
such soil conditions unsuitable and no obvious increase in their
numbers occurred.
This agreed with another observation of some
interest, which was frequently repeated. In following the ploughs
in the autumn and spring in the Spalding area, I always found
that where heavy dressings of artificials were used every year,
with or without organic matter, earthworms were rare. I sometimes
walked half a mile after the ploughs and cultivators without seeing
one. Further, on this artificially manured land the dense flocks
of seabirds which so often follow the plough were seldom to be
seen. These birds had evidently learnt from experience that certain
areas of Holbeach Marsh were not worth while as feeding grounds.
In the course of these green-manure experiments
in Lincolnshire I spent some time in studying the earthworms on
land similar to Mr. Caudwell's farms but which were regularly
dressed with farmyard manure. Here earthworms were abundant and
in some of the old tunnels I frequently observed the reaction
of the roots of the potato (King Edward) to fresh worm casts.
The fine roots often followed these tunnels downwards, but whenever
they passed the earthworm casts a fine network of roots was given
off laterally which penetrated the casts in all directions. Obviously
the potato was making full use of these accumulations.
Why do the roots of the potato always invade
earthworm casts? The answer is to be found in the work of a number
of investigators. In 1890 Wollny began a study of the place of
earthworms in agriculture (Forschungen auf der Gebiet der
Agrikultur-Physik, 13, 1890, s. 381). He found, as a result
of five years' work with cereals and legumes, that the mere addition
of earthworms to soil led to a marked increase of grain (35 to
50 per cent) and of straw (40 per cent) above that of similar
cultures without earthworms. Equally favourable results were obtained
with flax, potatoes, and beetroots. In not a single instance did
his cultures suffer any damage from earthworms. No support was,
therefore, obtained for the common assertion that earthworms pull
up young plants and carry them into the mouths of their burrows.
Having seen for himself that soil containing earthworms was considerably
more fertile than a soil free from these animals, Wollny set to
work to ascertain the cause. He found that earthworms markedly
improved the permeability of soils and led to better aeration.
As regards the chemical composition of the soil inhabited by earthworms,
he observed a considerable increase in the soluble nitrogen and
in the available minerals as compared with similar worm-free soil.
How far these results were due to the worm casts or to the dead
earthworms was, however, not determined.
Wollny's work was afterwards confirmed by a
number of investigators. In 1910 Russell (Journal of Agricultural
Science, 3, 1910, p. 246) showed that earthworms contain
1.5 to 2 per cent of nitrogen and decompose rapidly and completely,
thus furnishing plant food to the soil in which they die. In 1942
H. J. M. Jacobson of the Connecticut Experiment Station compared
the composition of the earthworm casts and uncontaminated soil
from the farm of Christopher M. Gallup at North Stonington and
obtained the following results:
| Lb. per Million of Soil | Castings | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Casts | Soil 0-6 in. | over soil | |
| Nitrate nitrogen | 22 | 4.5 | 4.89 |
| Available phosphate | 150 | 20.8 | 7.21 |
| Replaceable potassium | 357.8 | 31.9 | 11.22 |
| Humus | 89,500 | 57,800 | 1.55 |
Curtis has summed up these interesting results
in a press note issued by the Connecticut Station, which was reproduced
in the Gardeners' Chronicle of 17th July 1943. These
analytical results amplify and re-state in terms of chemistry
Darwin's conclusion that 'worms prepare the ground in an excellent
manner for the growth of fibrous-rooted plants and for seedlings
of all kinds'. They also direct attention to a sadly neglected
branch of the chemistry of the soil -- the part played by the
waste products of the soil population in plant nutrition. A detailed
account of these Connecticut investigations has just been published
in Soil Science (58, 1944, pp. 367-75).
How does a dressing of a complete artificial
manure affect the rest of the soil's animal population? It is
a matter of common knowledge that chemical manures influence the
number of animals like moles and toads. Both these prey on earthworms.
That moles do not work in land which has been treated with chemicals
is well known. An interesting confirmation of this fact was recorded
in an account of some experiments on grassland in Scotland early
this century. Between plots manured with farmyard manure strips
were treated with a complete artificial. It was observed that
the moles, which were abundant in the two dunged plots, always
moved from one of these plots to the other in a straight line
across the artificially manured plot between and never threw up
any molehills on this land. They seemed to know by instinct that
such areas were useless as feeding grounds. From such a simple
experiment as this much could be learned. The deleterious effect
of artificials on the earthworm population could easily be demonstrated
by a set of counts. The reaction of moles to artificials would
be obvious from the absence of molehills. If the behaviour of
the grazing animal is watched, it will be found that the two dunged
plots will be grazed to the ground, while the artificially manured
plots are only lightly picked over. When, therefore, in the cycle
-- humus-filled soil, the grass carpet, and the animal -- a substitute
for humus is introduced in the shape of chemicals, the earthworms
first abandon such soil, the moles follow suit, while the grazing
animal records an adverse verdict on the quality of the forage.
These results have been confirmed in the United
States where sulphate of ammonia is sometimes used to destroy
the earthworms on golf putting greens and tennis lawns because
the castings interfere with these games by clinging to the ball.
In Farmers' Bulletin 1569 of the United States Department
of Agriculture published in 1935 it is stated: 'The results of
three years' application of ammonium sulphate to sod on the experimental
farm of the Department of Agriculture at Arlington, Pa., for fertilizing
purposes have shown incidentally that earthworms were eliminated
from the plots where this chemical was used. When applied to soils
which are naturally neutral or slightly acid in character, this
fertilizer creates a strongly acid condition that is distasteful
to the worms and they disappear.'
The use of artificial manures is not the only
modern practice which destroys the earthworm. Hardly less injurious
are the poison sprays such as Bordeaux mixture and other powders
containing copper salts, tar oils, and the lime sulphur washes
used for the control of insect pests. Perhaps the most complete
account of such results is that given by Dreidax in the Archiv
für Pflanzenbau, 7, 1921, and in Rationelle Landwirtschaft,
Wilhelm Andermann, Berlin, 1927. The first of these papers concludes
with a long list of references dealing among other matters with
investigations on the earthworm since The Formation of Vegetable
Mould was published in 1881. In the latter work Dreidax sums
up his observations on the deleterious effects of poison sprays
on the earthworm population of vineyards in Germany.
While examining a vineyard situated in the Markgraf
near Auggen in South Baden, in which poison sprays were constantly
used, he found a surprising fall from the abundant earthworm population
of meadows and orchards under grass adjoining the vineyard to
that of the vineyard itself. The growth of the vines always corresponded
closely with the number of earthworms: the rows next the grass
border were well developed: the vines in the centre of the vineyard,
where there were no earthworms, did badly. In this investigation
the earthworm population under the grass border invariably stopped
dead wherever poison sprays reached the turf.
A visit to almost any orchard in Kent during
the spring immediately after the trees are sprayed with tar oils
or lime sulphur will be sufficient to prove how harmful this spraying
is to the earthworm population. The ground soon afterwards is
covered with a carpet of dead worms.
It is in the United States of America that Darwin's
studies of the earthworm have of recent years attracted most attention
and have also been carried further in a number of useful directions.
The reader interested in these developments should begin with
the work of Dr. Oliver who, in 1937, published Our Friend
the Earthworm, which contains a detailed account of his studies.
Starting life as a doctor, quite by chance he read Darwin's account
of the work of the earthworm and at once began to investigate
the relation of these animals to crop production. Soon he obtained
evidence which fully confirmed Darwin's findings. Thus was started
a series of experiments on the culture of earthworms, on the production
of new types by hybridization, and the distribution of egg capsules
for the purpose of re-stocking and improving derelict land almost
devoid of these creatures. His success was immediate and in two
years he sold his medical practice and set up as a landscape engineer,
his main work being to improve private estates and public parks.
By 1920 he had become independent and was able to move to Los
Angeles, where he pursued his investigations on a ten-acre experimental
farm. In 1937 he published his results in the above-mentioned
work of three volumes, which has helped hundreds of farmers all
over the United States to restore fertility to barren land in
which the earthworm population had been destroyed by artificial
manures and poison sprays.
One factor in Oliver's career must be emphasized.
His mind was prepared for the message contained in The Formation
of Vegetable Mould by his early connection with farming,
a detailed account of which will be found in the issue of Organic
Gardening (The Rodale Press, Emmaus, Pa., U.S.A.) of June
1943. As a small boy, he went to live with his grandfather in
Huron County, Ohio, on a 160-acre family holding which had been
farmed continuously for sixty years on organic lines. This farm
was divided into four blocks of 40 acres, one of which was taken
up by the homestead, garden, orchard, and park, the other three
blocks being used for mixed farming. In the centre of the whole
160 acres was the farmyard of 2 acres, which communicated directly
with each of the four 40-acre blocks by large, swinging gates.
In the centre of the farmyard, in which the livestock were kept
during the winter, was the compost pit, 50 feet wide and 100 feet
long, which had been excavated to a depth of 2 feet. Down the
middle line of this compost pit about 20 feet from each end were
two heavy posts about 12 feet high, each connected with the barn
by a cable furnished with large travelling baskets, by which the
manure from the great barn was transported each morning to the
compost pit, where it was evenly spread. When necessary the contents
of the compost pit could be flooded by gravity flow from a neighbouring
stream, which also supplied the drinking troughs of the livestock.
The heart of this farm, on which crop failures were unknown, was
the compost pit and its vast earthworm population of several millions.
An essential item of the daily work of the farm
was the care of this compost pit. Every morning the barn was cleared
of the droppings of the livestock, which were evenly spread, together
with all the available soiled litter, on the compost heap. When
about a foot deep, several tons of red clay from the floor of
a pond were distributed all over the compost pit. In this way
the vast earthworm population was supplied with organic and mineral
food. After the spring thaw, the upper layer of the compost pit
was removed and the rich dark crumbling layer of sweet-smelling
worm casts was removed by shovels into wagons and spread on the
fields just in front of the ploughs. In this way an effective
addition to the food materials needed by the new crop, as well
as a copious supply of earthworms and egg capsules, was given
to the land. Care was always taken to leave behind in the compost
pit an adequate supply of earthworm castings, which acted 'as
a 'mother substance' for the composting of the surplus top material
when that was returned to the pit and composting was re-started.
This early experience naturally influenced Oliver
in his later work. He had observed in his boyhood that earthworms
will thrive and that a concentration of many thousands to the
cubic yard is possible, provided a suitable environment, sufficient
moisture, and above all ample food are supplied.
Another feature of this Ohio farm was the regular
rotation practised -- two straw crops (wheat and maize) -- followed
by a temporary ley of mixed timothy and clover. Every year some
forty acres of this ley were turned under. These areas always
contained an unbelievable earthworm population.
A further detail must be mentioned. Four acres
were in orchard, while other fruit trees were planted in the hedgerows.
Oliver's grandfather never allowed these trees to be cultivated.
His motto was: 'Never disturb the soil under a tree. The earthworms
are the best people for taking care of a tree and I don't want
them disturbed.'
Oliver concludes the autobiographical fragment,
from which the above account of his grandfather's farm is taken,
with the following words:
'In this example of my grandfather's earthworm
farm, we have the technique of utilizing the earthworm in general
farming operations either on a large or on a small scale. From
my experience as a small boy growing up on this farm with much
friendly and loving instruction from my grandfather on the subject
of earthworms, and in my own work covering a period of more than
forty years, I am fully convinced that the eventual salvation
of the soil of our country will include the harnessing of the
earthworm as one of the major measures. And from my experience
I know that the soil can be made to produce several times as much
food as the present average through the proper harnessing and
utilization of the earthworm under control.'
The preceding paragraph will help to explain
the origin of the present-day interest in the place of the earthworm
in farming, which is rapidly growing in the United States of America
and which is now linked up with the campaign against artificial
manures and poison sprays.
There is a growing volume of evidence from all
over the world that agriculture took the wrong road when artificial
manures were introduced to stimulate crop production and when
poison sprays became common to check insect and fungous pests.
Both these agencies destroy the earthworm and thus deprive the
farmer of an important member of his unpaid labour force. There
is also a strong case for believing that one of the roots of present-day
disease in crops, livestock, and mankind can be traced to an impoverished
soil and that these troubles are aggravated by the use of chemical
manures.
The publication of the evidence which indicates
that all is not well in our farming and gardening has very naturally
disturbed the advocates of chemical farming. What has been described
as the war in the soil has broken out and is now in full swing.
The most effective way for all concerned of conducting this contest
will be to pose to Mother Earth herself the question: What is
your decision in this battle between organic and inorganic manuring?
When this decision has been duly given, it will have to be interpreted.
Live stock can be relied upon to say that the grain, fodder and
forage raised with humus is far superior to that obtained with
the help of chemicals. The earthworms will unhesitatingly plump
for organic manuring. We can read their message by a simple count
and by observing their general condition and activities.
There is no better soil analyst than the lowly
earthworm. Our most experienced gardeners invariably judge the
condition of their plots by the earthworm content. If in the autumn
cultivation one large well-fed active lob-worm is turned up with
each spadeful of soil, they consider that their land is in excellent
condition for the next year's crop. If, on the other hand, earthworms
are few in number, pale in colour, and rolled up in a ball, they
consider that a good dressing of organic manure is needed (King,
F. C., Gardening with Compost, Faber and Faber, 1944,
pp. 70-76). All this agrees with the way the tribesmen in the
Sahara judge the fertility of the soils of the oases by the number
of the earthworm casts. These, as we have seen, constitute the
perfect food for plants. Obviously we should do all in our power
to increase this supply by providing the earthworms with the food
and with the working conditions they need.
In directing attention to one of Nature's chief
agents for restoring and maintaining the fertility of our soils,
the publication of this new edition of Darwin's book will do much
to establish the truth that Nature is the supreme farmer and gardener,
and that the study of her ways will provide us with the one thing
we need -- sound and reliable direction.
-- Albert Howard, 14 Liskeard Gardens, Blackheath, S.E.3. 4th
January 1945.