 |
by André Voisin
CHAPTER 11
Influence of nitrogenous fertilizers on the
organic and mineral balance of herbage

Influence of nitrogenous fertilizer on the content of nitrogenous substances
in grass

The primary and well-known effect of nitrogenous fertilizers is to raise
the nitrogen (see Table 20), that is, crude
protein,1
content of the herbage. This is not an absolute rule, however, because in
some cases these fertilizers can depress
white clover.2
The latter being richer in nitrogen than the Gramineae, the effect of
the nitrogenous fertilizer on the nitrogen content of the
herbage is more or less obvious and may even become negative in some
cases.3
Be this as it may, it can be said that under present-day conditions
nitrogenous fertilizer increases the nitrogen content of the herbage. At
the same time, however, it affects the nature and relative proportions of
the various substances that make up the crude protein. Relatively little
is known about these alterations in the composition of the nitrogen
fraction in grass brought about by nitrogenous fertilizers. All that can
be said is that, as the result of nitrogenous fertilizers being
applied:
|
The amino-acid composition of the crude
protein 4
is altered.
|
|
|
The nitrogenous substances as a whole, for a given physiological age of
grass become more readily reducible to
ammonia 5
in the course of digestion (see Table 20); this effect becomes more marked,
the shorter the interval between the application of the nitrogenous
fertilizer and the grazing of the herbage.
|
|
It is likewise possible for fertilizer containing nitrate to affect the
nitrate content of the herbage, which is dependent on many factors. From
the grazier's point of view it is important to know that stage of maturity
exerts a considerable influence on the nitrate content of herbage: the
younger the grass the higher the nitrate content. And a high nitrate
content 6
can lead in the course of digestion to the formation of nitrites which are
toxic substances. The extent of the contribution of these nitrites to
grass tetany is still unknown.
It should be borne in mind that herbage of a given physiological age has
a lower dry-matter content when it receives nitrogenous fertilizer. It
will be seen that this scarcity of dry matter may contribute indirectly to
hypomagnesaemia.

Antagonism between magnesium and ammonium ions

A fundamental question from the point of view of grass tetany is how the
various nitrogenous fertilizers affect the potassium and magnesium contents
of the herbage. This effect depends on many factors and particularly on
the pH of the soil. In principle the soil of a grass sward should have a
pH 7
of 6-0 - 6-5: 8
that is, the soil is always slightly acid and this appears to be beneficial
to the health of the grazing
animal.9
Variations in pH from this optimum, be they in one direction or the other,
profoundly influence the interactions of the soil ions, particularly the
effects of the ions supplied by nitrogenous fertilizers on the absorption
of magnesium.10

Different nitrogenous fertilizers and the magnesium content of green oats

As long ago as 1937 ITALLIE's experiments (Table 13)
demonstrated the
effect of different nitrogenous fertilizers on the magnesium content of a
green graminaceous crop, oats, grown on an acid soil.

Table 13: Influence of different nitrogenous
fertilizers on the magnesium content of green oats
When no magnesium or
potassium fertilizers are applied, yield and magnesium content increase in
the following order:
|
sulphate of ammonia
|
|
|
nitrate of ammonia
|
|
|
sodium nitrate
|
|
|
sulphate of ammonia + chalk.
|
|
More or less the same order of effect from the four types of nitrogenous
fertilizer is maintained where potassium fertilizer is applied. The latter
very significantly reduced the magnesium content of the crop. The
application of magnesium fertilizer increases both yield and magnesium
content of the crop in every case. but the fundamental point that emerges
is that this application of magnesium, i.e. adequately increasing the
magnesium content of the soil, eliminates the differences in effect on
magnesium content between the different nitrogenous fertilizers although
the difference in yield due to these fertilizers
persist.11
This is a further illustration of the fact that variations in the yield
and biological quality of plants do not necessarily follow a parallel
course.

The use of sulphate of ammonia on pastures is only permissible if the soil
contains sufficient available calcium and magnesium

In other words, the beneficial effect of nitrate ions compared with
sulphate ions on the magnesium content of the plant is particularly obvious
where the soil is deficient in
magnesium.12
This means that the unfavourable effect of sulphate of ammonia diminishes,
and may even disappear if the pH is higher and/or the soil richer in
magnesium. Fig. 17 also demonstrates that even on a slightly acid soil
sulphate of ammonia reduces the magnesium content of the herbage only very
slightly. Two very important practical conclusions from the grass tetany
point of view may therefore be reached:
1. On a soil acid and/or relatively low in available magnesium there is the
danger that sulphate of ammonia will accentuate the magnesium deficiency
of the herbage and favour grass tetany (a situation, moreover, that
frequently arises in
practice).13
2. If the necessary dressings of
calcium 14
and/or magnesium are applied to the soil, sulphate of ammonia neither
reduces the magnesium content of the herbage nor increases the risk of tetany.
It must not be forgotten, moreover, that sulphate of ammonia can cause the
magnesium content of herbage to vary not only by virtue of direct action
but also by modifying the
flora.15
HEMINGWAY, for example found that on a heavy loamy soil with a pH of 6-5,
sulphate of ammonia was able in the first year to increase very
slightly 16
the magnesium content of the
grass 17
but ultimately eradicated clover, which is richer in magnesium than the
grasses (see Tables 25 and 26), with the result that after a few years of
sulphate of ammonia application the magnesium content of the herbage was
reduced.

The animal grazing a young sward rich in protein excretes urine of very
high nitrogen content

Sight must not be lost of the fact that if the herbage affects the grazing
animal, the animal likewise affects the herbage. The potassium in grass
affects the cow, but the result is a urine richer in potassium (Table 18),
which in its turn will alter the composition of the grass. A similar
phenomenon is manifested in the case of nitrogenous fertilizers. As was
stated at the beginning of this chapter, fertilizer nitrogen increases the
crude protein content of the herbage, but, as SJOLLEMA found, cows grazing
herbage very rich in crude protein excrete in their urine quantities of
nitrogen which may be as much as three times what they excrete when
fed a normal ration. In addition, the nitrogenous composition of such
urine is markedly altered.18
In other words, a large part of the nitrogen applied in the form of
fertilizer will be rapidly returned via the excrement, particularly the
urine. How will this urine, very rich in nitrogenous substances of a
different nature and composition, act on the composition of the herbage
and subsequently on the animal? No reply is possible as yet because of our
very imperfect knowledge of the exact composition of the urine of a cow
grazing a very young sward. It seems probable, however, that a urine much
richer in nitrogen than normal will alter the composition of the
nitrogenous fraction of the herbage. It is not impossible, moreover, that
certain nitrogenous substances present in this urine of special composition
may help to give rise 19
in very young, rapidly growing grass, to the development of tetanigenic
substances.20
Finally, let it be noted that this immediate return to the soil of a high
proportion of the nitrogen in herbage of very high nitrogen content will
not lead, as in the case of potassium, to an accumulation of nitrogen in
the soil. As soon as ammonia is converted to the nitrate form it is either
absorbed by the herbage or washed away by rain.

Antagonism of nitrogenous fertilizers and copper

The statistical data published by different research workers show that
grass giving rise to grass tetany is abnormally low in copper. It is still
impossible to state with certainty whether this copper deficiency plays a
part in grass tetany, although this does seem to be probable. It might be
wise, therefore, to recall that nitrogenous
fertilizers,21
by their slow, cumulative effect produce a deficiency of
copper, resulting probably from the formation of complex compounds
of ammonium and copper ions.
To counteract this effect of nitrogenous fertilizers it seems
essential 22
that the necessary dressings of copper
fertilizers 23
should be applied in future to pastures when nitrogenous fertilizers are
being used.24
| Go To Chapter 12 |
| Grass Tetany Table of Contents |
| Home |
Ag. Library |
Health Library |
Sovereignty Library |
Notes
[Click on asterisk (*) at the end of a note to return
to the point you left in the text]
-
See Grass Productivity (pp. 60-1) on the common and serious confusion of
nitrogen and protein. *
- See Better Grassland Sward (pp. 213-54). *
-
See Table 24, where the application of nitrogenous fertilizer depressed
the white clover but nevertheless considerably increased the crude protein
content of the herbage *
- See the influence of nitrogenous fertilizer on the
amino acid composition of Italian ryegrass in Soil, Grass and
Cancer (Table 3, p. 3). *
-
And to hydrogen sulphide (see Fig. 7). *
-
It is impossible to fix a dangerous maximum nitrate content for grass in
view of the many factors entering into play to accentuate or diminish the
toxic effects of nitrates. According to BECKER'S research work the dangers
of a nitrate excess appear to be limited. *
-
Measured with a potassium chloride solution. *
-
As always this is only a very general rule, to be altered according to the
soil. *
-
A higher pH rapidly gives rise to manganese deficiencies, not to mention
its many other effects. *
-
Between the magnesium ions (Mg++) and the ammonium ions
(NH4+) there is an
antagonism that is not direct but indirect. In very simplified terms it
may be said that when the ammonium ion is adsorbed by the roots there is
an exchange of ammonium and hydrogen (H+) ions. The latter will therefore
exert an antagonistic influence on the absorption of magnesium by the plant.
The more acid the soil and the greater the quantities of nitrogenous
fertilizer with ammonium ions (such as ammonium sulphate or ammonium
nitrate) applied, the more marked this antagonistic effect. *
-
To cite one single example: the magnesium contents of green oats are more
or less identical (0-25 and 0-24%) whether sulphate of ammonia is applied
alone or in conjunction with chalk in cases where no
potassium fertilizer is applied but where magnesium fertilizer is used.
Under these conditions the application of chalk along with sulphate of
ammonia increased the yield from 55 to 82. *
-
As MULDER states, the difference in effect on plant magnesium between
nitrates and sulphates is smaller, the higher the MgO : N ratio in the
fertilizers applied.
According to 'T HART's data nitrogenous fertilizer appears rather to
tend to increase the magnesium content of the grass very slightly.*
-
For the effect of sulphate of ammonia on hypomagnesaemia see Chapter 28,
Tables 20 and 24 and Fig. 18. ENDER made the observation that hypomagnesaemia
was more marked where sulphate of ammonia and potassium sulphate were applied
than in the case of equivalent dressings of nitrogen and potash in the form
of ammonium nitrate and potassium chloride. In addition, under the conditions
of the experiment, cases of tetany occurred with the first combination of
fertilizers, whereas there were no cases with the second. It appears,
therefore, that the application of large quantities
of sulphate ions may, under certain conditions, promote hypomagnesaemia
and tetany (see Fig. 7).
It must be remembered that the sulphur content of grass is increased by
dressings of ammonium sulphate. ENDER, for example, found that the sulphur
content of the dry matter of grass was 0-188% when ammonium nitrate was
applied and rose to 0-312%, i.e. 65% more, when sulphate of ammonia was
applied.
In another connexion it appears that the sulphate ion content of the
blood serum of cows suffering from grass tetany is increased. In view of
this correlation some authors have thought that the sulphate of ammonia
contributes to the tetany not only by reducing the magnesium but also by
raising the sulphur content of the grass. *
-
Note that there is a "reciprocal" effect between the calcium fertilizer
and the sulphate of ammonia. Excessively high rates of chalk or marl
application to a pasture give rise to various serious deficiencies, both in
the herbage and in the stock. One of these is manganese deficiency,
the manganese ions in the soil becoming unavailable because
the pH is too high.
The application of fertilizers containing manganese has relatively
little effect, because the conditions existing in the soil rapidly render
the element unavailable. The most effective method, therefore, is to apply
sulphate of ammonia, which, by lowering the pH, will re-establish the
availability of part of the total manganese in the soil. *
-
For the influence of nitrogenous fertilizers on the flora see Better
Grassland Sward (pp. 213-54). *
-
The Gramineae in this experiment contained about 0 - 11% magnesium in the
dry matter, a very low and very dangerous content. In the first year
sulphate of ammonia application raised this mean figure to 0-13%. *
-
TODD, however, observed that on certain soils the application of sulphate
of ammonia brought about an increase in the magnesium content of the
herbage at the beginning of the grazing season but this effect could be
the reverse during the remainder of the season. *
-
In cows eating young grass very rich in crude protein:
The percentage urea nitrogen in relation to total nitrogen increases considerably.
The benzoic acid content can be multiplied by four.
It is interesting to note that the histamine content of the urine
of an animal receiving a ration low in magnesium may be multiplied by 7
(seven). *
-
'T HART, at the 7th International Grassland Congress, quite rightly
remarked in the course of the discussion that: "The return of urine by the
grazing cow might be a more important cause of tetany than the application
of nitrogenous or potassium mineral fertilizers to the pasture."
*
-
For the possible presence in young grass of a particular tetanigenic
substance, see Chapter 25. *
-
It was seen in Soil, Grass and Cancer (pp. 35-7) that this copper deficiency
manifests itself in the grazing animal in a lower copper content in the
blood serum and liver. *
-
Even if the low copper content of grass does not promote tetany, this
dressing of copper in conjunction with nitrogenous fertilizers is
obligatory. Copper deficiencies give rise to many metabolic disorders in
the grazing animal, the most common being sterility. *
-
Each year 6 lb./acre [7 kg./ha.] approximately copper sulphate or the
equivalent thereof in the form of other copper fertilizers. *
-
Having recognized this danger, certain European firms producing chemicals
now manufacture nitrogenous fertilizers containing copper. The enlightened
attitude of these manufacturers can only be applauded. *
|
 |